Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 TEX 146 - Stroble v. Tearl

Stroble v. Tearl’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2006 · most notably Hall v. Hard (1960), Sherman v. Bruton (1973)

27 state decisions

1001949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dabney v. Edwards · Dority v. Dority · Markham IRR. Co. v. Brown · Del Curto v. Billingsley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person may not maintain an action in this state to recover a commission for the sale or purchase of real estate unless the promise or agreement on which the action is based, or a memorandum, is in writing and signed by the party against whom the action is brought or by a person authorized by that party to sign the document.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.