Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 148 U.S. 490 - Smith v. Townsend

Smith v. Townsend’s Empirical Analysis

148 U.S. 490 · 1893

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 7 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2014 · most notably Great Northern Ry Co v. United States (1942), Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baird (1904)

19 federal appellate · 7 district · 20 state decisions

2701893190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Platt v. Union Pacific Railroad · United States v. Union Pacific Railroad · Ogden v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Until such lands are opened to settlement by proclamation of the president, no person shall be permitted to enter upon and occupy the same, and no person violating this provision shall ever be permitted to enter any of said lands or acquire any right thereto.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Statutes against frauds are to be liberally and beneficially expounded. This may seem a contradiction to the last rule; most statutes against frauds being in their consequences penal. But this difference is here to be taken: Where the statute acts upon the offender, and inflicts a penalty, as the pillory, or a fine, it is then to be taken strictly; but when the statute acts upon the offense, by setting aside the fraudulent transaction, here it is to be construed liberally.” 1 Bl. Com. 88.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]hoever obtained title from the government to any ... land through which ran this right of way would acquire a fee to the whole tract subject to the easement of the company, and if ever the use of that right of way was abandoned by the railroad company the easement would cease, and the full title to that right of way would vest in the patentee of the land”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.