Repash v. Repash’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2013
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1201 · 10 U.S.C. § 1408 · 38 U.S.C. § 3101 · 38 U.S.C. § 3105
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · 142 Cal. App. 3d 350 - In Re Marriage of Hopkins · 335 Pa. Super. 348 - Parker v. Parker · 442 So. 2d 102 - Mims v. Mims · Bibens v. Bibens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would preclude an assignment or apportionment of plaintiff's veteran disability benefits, it does not preclude consideration of disability benefits by a trial court as a source of income upon which an award of alimony may be based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“disability benefits received in lieu of retirement benefits are not subject to division.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may be considered for alimony or spousal maintenance payments”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.