Bloomberg v. Bloomberg’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1949
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Windt v. Banniza · Cramer v. Cramer · Crooks v. Rust · Schlotfeldt v. Bull
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant, having been granted a new trial, cannot appeal upon the ground of a denial of the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, for the reason that there has been no final appealable order or judgment entered, and ‘this court will not “permit a cause to be brought before it by piecemeal for review, unless clearly authorized so to do by legislative enactment.” ’ Schlotfeldt v. Bull, 13 Wash. 242 , 54 Pac. 33 ; Windt v. Banniza, 2 Wash. 147 , 26 Pac. 189 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.