148 Wis. 2d 852 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · 113 Wis. 2d 199 - County of Milwaukee v. State, Labor & Industry Review Commission · 126 Wis. 2d 63 - Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources · 135 Wis. 2d 477 - State v. Vonesh · 39 Wis. 2d 419 - State v. Voshart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the seized property is a dangerous weapon or ammunition, the property shall not be returned to any person who committed a crime involving the use of the dangerous weapon or the ammunition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perez · State v. Perez“If the person committed a crime with a firearm ... the firearm . . . may not be returned to him or her.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A firearm may be involved in the commission of some crimes by its mere presence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Perez · State v. Perez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.