148 W. Va. 411 - Konchesky v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably 158 W. Va. 314 - Parker v. Knowlton Construction Company, Inc. (1975), 177 W. Va. 710 - Nancy Viola R. v. RANDOLPH W. (1987)
3 federal appellate · 48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 139 W. Va. 549 - Stenger v. Hope Natural Gas Co. · 146 W. Va. 130 - Whitney v. Ralph Myers Contracting Corporation · 147 W. Va. 402 - Butler v. Smith's Transfer Corp. · 144 W. Va. 92 - Mullins v. Baker · Monaghan v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Formal exceptions to rulings or orders of the court are unnecessary; but for all purposes for which an exception has heretofore been necessary it is sufficient that a ■party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known, to the court the action which he desires the court to take or his objection to the action of the court and his grounds therefor[.]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Rule 46 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure provides that in lieu of a formal exception it is sufficient if a party against whom a ruling or order is made opposes the action taken by the court at the time it is made and indicates the action which he desires, or, if such party did not have an opportunity to object at the time any ruling or order was made by the trial court on a motion of the opposing party, no objection or exception is required and an appellate court may consider the alleged error even though no formal objection or exception was made or taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The general rule in determining the amount of damages for injury to real property in a case of this kind is to allow the difference between the market value of the plaintiff’s premises before the injury happened and the market value immdiately after the injury, taking into account only the damage which has re- suited from the defendant’s acts. The reasonable cost of repairs, if properly proved, can be considered as evidence in determining the market value of property after it has been damaged.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.