¶1Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented upon the ground that if the plaintiff is entitled to recover at all, he should recover for ah the timber on the tract, which so far as appears would naturally have been delivered to the river on the way to market.
149 A.D. 930
Dunlevie v. Droney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 1912
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1912-03-15
Decided 1912-03-15