¶1In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated May 5, 1987, which denied his motion to dismiss the action.
¶2Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted and the action is dismissed.
¶3Even assuming, arguendo, that the Statute of Limitations was properly tolled pursuant to CPLR 203 (b) (5), which is not established by the record, we find that personal jurisdiction was not obtained over the defendant. The parties agree that the person served was a neighbor of the defendant. The plaintiffs’ purported service of a summons with notice pursu*573ant to CPLR 308 (2) was therefore defective since delivery to a neighbor is not delivery "to a person … at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served” (emphasis added). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.