Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

149 Ala. 193

Gillespie v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1907

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1907-02-07

Heard before Hon. A. A. Coleman. Action by Caroline I. Campbell -against James M. Gillespie, administrator. From a 'judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The first count in the complaint was for $191, dne by the administrator as such by account made by decedent on the 5th day of October, 1903. The second count was on an account stated between plaintiff and decedent on the same day.

Relies on Kornegay v. Mayer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1907-02-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1941

4 state decisions

2019071910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DOWDELL, J. —

¶1The complaint was on the common counts. We fail to see any merit in the demurrer to the complaint ,as amended.

¶2The account as filed in the probate court was not verified as required by the statute. The verification omitted the words, “after allowing all proper credits.”— Section 133, Code 1896. But by the provisions of this statute this defect or insufficiency of the verification may be cured by amendment.

¶3In Kornegay v. Mayer, 135 Ala. 141, 33 South. 36, it was decided that the highest and best evidence of the filing and docketing of the claim in the probate court is the docket entries there made.

¶4What the administrator paid some other person for Avaiting on the deceased during his last illness Avas Avholly irrelevant and immaterial. It was error to admit tixis evidence against the objection of the defendant, and for this error the case must be reversed. As the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial, it is unnecessary to consider the question of the court’s receiving the verdict after the jury had been discharged by the clerk without an order of the court.

¶5Reversed and remanded.

Tyson, C. J., and Anderson and McClellan, JJ., concur.
/149/ala/193 · .json · Public domain