In re Winer’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 554
Relies on United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Johnson · 48th Street Steakhouse, Inc. v. Rockefeller Group, Inc. · In re Sequoia Auto Brokers, Ltd. v. Idell · Wabash Valley Power Ass'n v. Rural Electrification Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no question but that on the date and time of filing the bankruptcy petition, Winer possessed the power and authority to wind up the affairs of Challenger. The question presented here is whether that power to “wind up” became property of the estate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Winer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.