Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 Colo. 235 - Robinson v. Crosson

Robinson v. Crosson’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TEL. CO. · Norton's Estate v. McAlister · Hoffman v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Modifications do not necessarily abrogate the original contract entirely; indeed, the terms of the old contract are still to be followed so far as not changed or as inconsistent with the new terms, and the governing contract may be said to be composed of the new terms and the unchanged terms of the old. An intention to discharge the old contract is not presumed, and it must be made to appear that the parties intended to terminate the old contract in its entirety in order for it to be superceded completely by the new one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.