Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.1d 114 - McBride v. Farrington

McBride v. Farrington’s Empirical Analysis

149 F. 114 · 1906

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
June 1917
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on The United States v. Phineas Bradley · Degraw v. . Elmore · Barnes v. . Quigley · McBride v. Farrington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The leases in question are for the mining of coal, iron, petroleum, oil, gas, asphaltum, and other minerals. If void as to the other minerals, they are apparently valid as to the coal. For what length of time they purported to run is not shown by .the record.- If for an indefinite time the terms of the. act would no doubt restrict them to ten years. It is difficult to see how such 'leases, which apparently conveyed some rights for a restricted period, can be held to be so utterly valueless as to constitute an entire failure of consideration.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is well settled that when a conveyance or contract contains conditions, some of which are legal and others illegal, and they are severable and separable as respects consideration and performance, the latter may be disregarded and the former enforced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.