Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.1d 586 - Newhall v. Jordan

Newhall v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis

149 F. 586 · 1906

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 1913
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Little v. Bowers · Railroad Company v. Commissioners · Chesebrough v. United States · Radich v. Hutchins · Brumagim v. Tillinghast

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““can only bo taxed at the sum imposed on bay rum in the United States. There is no such tax. lienee there is none on the imported article.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.