Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.2d 310 - Ake v. Chancey

Ake v. Chancey’s Empirical Analysis

149 F.2d 310 · 1945

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1998

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

40194519501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ake v. Chancey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that the contract allowed the client to fix the fee, but implied in such contract was the obligation on the client to fix a reasonable fee * * *»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.