Kuczynski v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
149 F.2d 478 · 1945
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1973
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000)
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Youtsey v. United States · Forthoffer v. Swope · Howard v. Overholser · Overholser v. Treibly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think the allegations as to petitioner’s insanity prior to the commission of the crime required investigation to ascertain the facts as to his mental condition and status at the time of his trial.” Kuczynski v. U.S., 149 F. 2d 478 (7th Cir., 1945).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tinsley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.