Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.2d 770 - Bleecker v. Drury

Bleecker v. Drury’s Empirical Analysis

149 F.2d 770 · 1945

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
5
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2004

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

601945195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. · Andrews v. . Gardiner · Marceau v. Great Lakes Transit Corp. · Bleecker v. Drury · United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Board conducts hearings in which the admissibility of evidence is ruled upon by the ... officer presiding. It limits the rights of persons to appear before it and in substance observes a procedure akin to that of the courts of record of New York. It makes full and conclusive determinations of both questions of fact and law, and an appeal may be taken from its determination to an appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Fearless administration of justice requires ... that an attorney have the privilege of representing his [or her] client's interests, without the constant menace of claims for libel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.