Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

149 F.2d 830

Docket Nos. 8770, 8823, 8910.

Creel v. Creel

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 8, 1945.

Decided May 21, 1945.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1945-05-21

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1950

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Butterfield v. Usher · Electric Boat Co. v. East Hampton Shipping Co. · Chas. McCaul Co. v. Harr

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1945-05-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Edwin J. Creel, appellant pro se.

¶2Mr. Selig C. Brez, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Leon Tobriner, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before MILLER, EDGERTON, and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The appeals in Nos. 8770 and 8823 are dismissed, on motion of appellee, because each was taken from a non-appealable order.1 The judgment of the court in No. 8910 is affirmed, as an examination of the record reveals no error and requires the conclusion that the trial court properly execised its discretion in confirming the order of sale.

¶6Nos. 8770 and 8823 dismissed.

¶7No. 8910 affirmed.

/149/f2d/830 · .json · Public domain