Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.2d 844 - Garrison v. Hunter

Garrison v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

149 F.2d 844 · 1945

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
January 1961
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 1961

24 federal appellate ·

170194519501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dunn v. United States · United States v. Oppenheimer · Collins v. Loisel · Moore v. Aderhold · Delendo Corp. v. Smolowe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a defendant is charged by two or more counts in an indictment, consistency between the verdicts on the several counts is not necessary. A verdict of acquittal on one count does not invalidate a verdict of guilty on another count although the same evidence is offered in support of each.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.