Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.2d 914 - Lamb v. Interstate S. S. Co.

Lamb v. Interstate S. S. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

149 F.2d 914 · 1945

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2014

4 federal appellate ·

4019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Russell Sturgis v. Herman Boyer · Globe S. S. Co. v. Moss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the injury complained of might well have resulted from one of many causes, it is incumbent upon the libellant to produce evidence which will exclude the operation of those causes for which the Master or the crew is under no legal obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.