16056b v. Dar Corbin’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 505 F. Supp. 2d 624 - McCarty v. Astrue (2007), 431 F. Supp. 2d 506 - Corona v. Barnhart (2006)
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Shalala v. Schaefer · Bunnell v. Sullivan · Murray v. Heckler · Kali v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]o a prevailing party ... incurred by that party in any civil action ... including proceedings for judicial review of agency action, brought by or against the United States in any court having jurisdiction of that action, unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.