Goetz v. Glickman’s Empirical Analysis
149 F.3d 1131 · 1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 7 U.S.C. § 2901 (Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985) · 7 U.S.C. § 2902 · 7 U.S.C. § 2904 · 7 U.S.C. § 2906 · 7 U.S.C. § 2909
Relies on United States v. Lopez · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Roberts v. United States Jaycees · Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc. · Nordlinger v. Hahn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ur task is merely to determine whether Congress could have had a rational basis to support the exercise of its commerce power; and, further, that the regulatory means chosen were reasonably adapted to the end permitted by the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[i]t is now indisputable that the power to regulate interstate commerce includes the power to promote interstate commerce'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress' commerce power is limited to restricting or prohibiting an activity,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.