Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.3d 494 - Johnson v. Jones

Johnson v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

149 F.3d 494 · 1998

Citation profile

146
cited by 146 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 15 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 146 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Montgomery v. Noga (1999), American Council of Certified Podiatric Physicians & Surgeons v. American Board of Podiatric Surgery, Inc. (1999)

36 federal appellate · 15 district · 1 state decisions

8901998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. · Wrenn v. McFadden · Watson v. United States · Texas State Commission for the Blind v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]o award of statutory damages or of attorney's fees, as provided by sections 504 and 505, shall be made for ... (2) any infringement of copyright commenced after first publication of the work and before the effective date of its registration, unless such registration is made within three months after the first publication of the work.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which— (A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or and as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person[.] 15 U.S.C. Section 1125 (a).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “shall not be used by the owner or others on other projects, for additions to this Project or for completion of this Project by others, unless the architect is adjudged to be in default under this agreement, except by agreement in writing with appropriate compensation to the Architect.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.