Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F.3d 709 - Majors v. Engelbrecht

Majors v. Engelbrecht’s Empirical Analysis

149 F.3d 709 · 1998

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Gilbertson v. Albright (2004), Pavey v. Conley (2008)

29 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

410199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n · Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd. · New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New Orleans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thomas is unpersuasive because it was based on the distinction between administrative enforcement proceedings and civil enforcement proceedings of the Huffman variety, a distinction that is immaterial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.