Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 FRD 474 - Lewis v. Velez

Lewis v. Velez’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2024

3 district ·

901993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Palmer v. Hoffman · Brewster v. Derwinski · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Yagow v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in' any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (A) the activities of the office or agency, or (B) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law as to which matters there was a duty to report, ... or (C) in civil action and proceedings ... factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “skirt too close to the impermissible suggestion that the [witness] had a propensity toward violence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.