Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 F. Supp. 46 - Bishop v. Macon Lumber Co.

149 F. Supp. 46 - Bishop v. Macon Lumber Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1964
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 501

Relies on Trustees v. Greenough · Central Railroad Banking Co of Georgia v. Pettus · Hobbs v. McLean · Guardian Trust Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. · In re Gillaspie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It should be noted that there are three attorneys asking separate allowances for their fees. I do not think this fund should bear three times the cost of one good attorney. Any one of the three attorneys was capable of prosecuting the litigation. The fact that they each had two assistants should not be imposed as an additional burden upon the fund.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.