Harris v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

cited by 18 later decisions

June 2019

most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Rosa v. Callahan · Schaal v. Apfel · Parker v. Harris · 16105b v. Dar Reddick · Carroll v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“A corollary to the treating physician rule is the so-called 'good reasons rule,' which is based on the regulations specifying that 'the Commissioner”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Hayden v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · Smith v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“Those good reasons must be supported by the evidence in the case record, and must be sufficiently specific ....”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Hayden v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · Smith v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“) denying her application for supplemental security income (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Medina v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. · Mojbel v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.