Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

149 Ga. 463

Nottingham v. McKelvey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1919

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1919-10-01

<p>Construction of will. Before Judge Tarver. Bartow superior court. July 27, 1918.</p>

Relies on Ewing v. Shropshire · Gibson v. Hardaway · Patterson v. Patterson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1919-10-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1981

10 state decisions

8019191920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1A will declared: “I give and bequeath to my nephew, Willie H. Stubbs, the two-thirds interest in all the land that was deeded to me by my father on the 23rd day of June, 1873, to have and to hold the same in fee simple. . . I give and bequeath to my nephew, Alpheus B. Stubbs, the remaining one-third interest in the land deeded to me by my father on the 23rd day of June, 1873.” By a codicil, executed on the same day the will was executed, it was provided: “I will and desire that if my two nephews, Willie H. Stubbs and Alpheus B. Stubbs, should die without heirs of their body, then that all my property that is willed and given to them go and be the property of [other named persons], to them and their heirs forever, in fee simple.” Held:

¶21. The words in the above items of the will and codicil give the land to the above-named nephews of the testatrix in fee simple, defeasible upon their dying without child or children, although such nephews survived the testatrix. Civil Code, § 3662; Gibson v. Hardaway, 68 Ga. 370; Ewing v. Shropshire, 80 Ga. 374 (7 S. E. 554); Brown v. Lane, 147 Ga. 1 (92 S. E. 517).

¶3(a) The cases of Patterson v. Patterson, 147 Ga. 44 (92 S. E. 882), and Heath v. Rhea, 149 Ga. 106 (99 S. E. 298), are distinguishable upon their facts.

¶42. The trial court erred in construing the will and rendering judgment in accordance with the erroneous construction given.

¶5Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except
/149/ga/463 · .json · Public domain