149 Ind. App. 274 - Rush v. Leiter’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1994
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lynch v. United States · Buchanan v. Warley · Holden v. Hardy · Dept. of Financial Institutions v. HOLT, ETC. · Department of Financial Institutions v. General Finance Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The following actions shall be commenced within the periods herein prescribed after the cause of action has accrued, and not afterwards. “First. For injuries to person or character, for injuries to personal property, and for a forfeiture of penalty given by statute, within two (2) years: * * *.” I.C. § 34-1-2-2. “All actions not limited by any other statute shall be brought within fifteen (15) years. In special cases, where a different limitation is prescribed by statute, the provisions of this act shall not apply.” I.C. § 34-1-2-3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shideler v. Dwyer““Plaintiff-appellee urges this court to adopt the narrow and restrictive view of the contested phrase [‘injuries to personal property’], thereby limiting its applicability to direct physical injury to tangible chattel property as distinguished from violations to rights in or to personal property or arising out of such injury. With this construction we cannot agree.” 149 Ind.App. at 277-78 , 271 N.E.2d at 507 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shideler v. Dwyer“all actions not limited by any other statute shall be brought within ten (10) years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haynes v. Contat
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.