Kinberger v. Drouet’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2009 · most notably Jaenke v. Taylor (1925), Trichel v. Home Ins. (1924)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Hussey · Lehman v. Rice · Barfield v. Saunders · Collins v. Desmaret · Anse La Butte (Le Danois) Oil & Mineral Co. v. Babb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A lease with the affirmative covenants of the lessee is a sufficient consideration for a contract giving the lessee a right to purchase the property during the continuance of the lease, so that the option cannot be withdrawn by the lessor during that time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If the plaintiff has the right to the title, it will be so decreed, and defendant Mrs. Drouet Will be condemned to sign the deed. If she refuses to sign, then the decree-will be the title.” See authorities therein cited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jaenke v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.