149 Misc. 2d 1017 - Winter v. Bernstein’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2012
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] shareholder is estopped to challenge a corporate policy which he or she affirmatively approved”)). . The Trustee has asserted direct causes of action against the LES Defendants on behalf of LFG as sole shareholder of LES. . The Trustee argues, for instance, that the issue of detrimental reliance raises questions of fact. .If Plaintiff ultimately is estopped from challenging the By-law provision, Maryland would not apply the exculpation provision to the extent that the misconduct constitutes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.