Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

149 Mo. 369

Holmes v. Leathe

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 9, 1899

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1899-05-09

<p>Koerner v. Leathe, ante, p. 361, followed and approved.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1918

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Aeeirmed · Decided 1899-05-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

GANTT, P. J.

¶1:This is an appeal from a judgment affirming an award. Tbe parties hereto entered into an *370agreement to arbitrate their differences as to the amount due plaintiff as an attorney and counselor at law for certain legal services rendered defendant. Messrs. Given Campbell, Samuel N. Holliday and John J. O’Brien were selected as arbitrators. They duly qualified, heard the evidence and rendered their award.

¶2In due time notice was given of the motion to make the award a judgment of the court. Thereupon defendant moved to vacate the award.

¶3The award was rendered by consent of the parties upon the same testimony heard in Koerner v. Leathe, the appeal in which latter case was heard at the same time with this appeal.

¶4The questions are identical. Eor the reasons given in Koerner v. Leathe, reported at page 361 of this volume, the judgment in this cause is also affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.
/149/mo/369 · .json · Public domain