Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 MONT 91 - State v. Portmann

State v. Portmann’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2013

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

60196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ferguson v. Standley · City of Butte v. Mikosowitz · State Ex Rel. Game, Forestation & Parks Commission v. Hull · Groshean v. Dillmont Realty Co. · Descheemaeker v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We recognize that there has been disagreement over the rules just stated. However, we find that the better reasoned cases are those which give the fullest recognition to the traditional requirements of adverse possession. For an annotation and a collection of cases on this question see 76 A.L.R.2d 535 .” 423 P.2d at 58 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the rights acquired by adverse user can never exeeed the greatest use made of the land for the full prescriptive period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.