149 N.C. App. 745 - Frazier v. McDonald's’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co. · 108 N.C. App. 762 - Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution · Morrison v. Burlington Industries · Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp. · Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the production of medical evidence that he is physically or mentally, as a consequence of the work related injury, incapable of work in any employment; (2) the production of evidence that he is capable of some work, but that he has, after a reasonable effort on his part, been unsuccessful in his effort to obtain employment; (3) the production of evidence that he is capable of some work but that it would be futile because of preexisting conditions, i.e., age, inexperience, lack of education, to seek other employment; or (4) the production of evidence that he has obtained other employment at a wage less than that earned prior to the injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“incapacity because of injury to earn the wages which the employee was receiving at the time of injury in the same or any other employment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as a result of the injury arising out of and in the course of his employment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.