Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 N.C. App. 777 - Harrold v. Dowd

149 N.C. App. 777 - Harrold v. Dowd’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
2
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 152 N.C. App. 240 - Governor's Club, Inc. v. Governors Club Ltd. Partnership (2002), CommScope Credit Union v. Butler & Burke, LLP (2016)

93 state decisions

730200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ragsdale v. Kennedy · Terry v. Terry · Oates v. Jag, Inc. · Barger v. McCoy Hillard & Parks · Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there has been a special confidence reposed in one who in equity and good conscience is bound to act in good faith and with due regard to the interests of the one reposing confidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he essential elements of actionable fraud are: (1) false representation or concealment of a material fact, (2) reasonably calculated to deceive, (3) made with intent to deceive, (4) which does in fact deceive, and (5) resulting in damage to the injured party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]n pleading actual fraud the particularity requirement is met by alleging time, place and content of the fraudulent representation, identity of the person making the representation and what was obtained as a result of the fraudulent acts or representations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.