149 N.C. App. 928 - Johnson v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles · Bryson v. Sullivan · Brooks v. Giesey · 107 N.C. App. 87 - MacK v. Moore · 136 N.C. App. 56 - Twaddell v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing a trial court's determination to award Rule 11 sanctions, the appellate court conducts a de novo review. Pursuant to this review, the appellate court must determine: (1) whether the trial court's conclusions of law support its judgment or determination, (2) whether the trial court's conclusions of law are supported by its findings of fact, and (3) whether the findings of fact are supported by a sufficiency of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.