State v. Calabaza’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Barker v. Wingo · State v. Garza · Shields v. Beto · Zurla v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the length of the delay and the nature of the defendant's circumstances at the time the state attempts to enforce the sentence, as well as whether the delay arose from a negligent mistake on the part of the [district] court or from deliberate or grossly negligent action, whether the defendant bears any responsibility for the delay, and whether the defendant has attempted to remedy the delay without success.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lopez“not believe the guidelines [were] ... specifically applicable in the speedy enforcement context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lopez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.