¶1There was evidence which iustified the jury in finding that the defendant made a personal promise to the plaintiff to pay the rent of the premises while he was in p05session. The question as to whether or not such a promise was made was submitted to the jury, and their verdict in favor of the plaintiff was justified by the evidence. The determination of the Appellate Term must be affirmed, with costs.
149 N.Y.S. 1089
Kaye v. Stern
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 30, 1914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1914-10-30
Action by Charles Kaye against Emil Stern. From a determination of the Appellate Term, affirming a )udg- ment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed. See, also, 144 N. Y. Supp. 160. A. B. Nathan, of New York City, for appellant. B. M. Kaye, of New York City, for respondent.
Decided 1914-10-30