149 Ohio App. 3d 182 - State v. Roten’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2025
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · State v. Dehass · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Grayned v. City of Rockford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person, purposely and by force or by unlawful threat of harm to any person or property, shall retaliate against a public servant, a party official, or an attorney or witness who was involved in a civil or criminal action or proceeding because the public servant *** discharged the duties of the public servant ***.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the admission or exclusion of relevant evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a materially false or fraudulent writing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.