149 Ohio App. 3d 627 - State v. Lordi’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably State v. Rogers, Ca2006-09-036 (7-23-2007) (2007), State v. Carson, 07ap-492 (11-29-2007) (2007)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · State v. Schiebel · 19 Ohio App. 3d 141 - State v. Walden · 142 Ohio St. 496 - State Ex Rel. Herbert v. Ferguson · Palazzi v. Estate of Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] party is unavoidably prevented from filing a motion for new trial if the party had no knowledge of the existence of the ground supporting the Delaware County, Case No. 18 CAA 03 0020 7 motion for a new trial and could not have learned of the existence of that ground within the time prescribed for filing the motion for new trial in the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he constitutionality of a state statute may not be brought into question by one who is not within the class against whom the operation of the statute is alleged to have been unconstitutionally applied and who has not been injured by its alleged unconstitutional provision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“which will provide in the mind of the trier of facts a firm belief or conviction as to the facts sought to be established.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Horton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.