State v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State v. Hand (Slip Opinion) (2016), State v. Womac (2007)
2 federal appellate · 77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Gault · Duncan v. State of Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`in deliberate disregard of the trial court's ruling,' or `an objection by itself would be so damaging as to be immune from any admonition or curative instruction by the trial court.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ra · State v. Pedro“an unusual circumstance exists `that makes it impossible to avoid the prejudicial impact of evidence that had previously been ruled inadmissible.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ra · State v. Pedro“[c]umulative error may warrant reversal, even if each error standing alone would otherwise be considered harmless.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones · State v. Bluehorse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.