Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 SO3D 1089 - S.T. v. K.P.

S.T. v. K.P.’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 672 So. 2d 497 - Ex Parte Integon Corp. · 856 So. 2d 766 - Neal v. Neal · Frahn v. Greyling Realization Corporation · 12 So. 3d 1214 - Ex Parte CJA · J.W. v. T.D.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Mandamus is a drastic and extraordinary -writ, to be issued only where there is (1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; (2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; (3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and (4) properly invoked jurisdiction of the court.’ Ex parte Integon Corp., 672 So.2d 497, 499 (Ala.1995).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If a child has an acknowledged father, an individual, who is not a signatory to the acknowledgment of paternity and who seeks an adjudication of paternity -of the child may maintain a proceeding at any time after the effective date of the acknowledgment if the court determines that it is in the best interest of the child.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.