Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 SO3D 1093 - Adams v. Adams

Adams v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 477 So. 2d 445 - Brannon v. Brannon · Ex Parte Devine · 628 So. 2d 918 - Grayson v. Grayson · A.B. v. J.B. · Herboso v. Herboso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ At the outset we note that, in reviewing the judgment by the trial court, we are governed by the well-established ore tenus rule. Under this rule, when the trial court has been presented evidence in a divorce case ore tenus, its judgment will be presumed to be correct and will not be set aside by this court unless it is plainly and palpably wrong or unjust.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.