Ivory Brunson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 959 So. 2d 1285 - Castella v. State · 555 So. 2d 360 - CANTERA EX REL. CANTERA v. Dist. Court of Appeal, Third Dist. · 788 So. 2d 334 - Williams v. State · 34 So. 3d 797 - Diaz v. State · McDowell v. McDowell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he mere fact that an unknown person opens the door when a police officer knocks cannot, standing alone, support a reasonable belief that the person possesses authority to consent to the officer’s entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“because a reasonable person would not conclude that the individual who answered the door had the authority to consent without confirming that he was the person renting the hotel room”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.