Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 SO3D 541 - Sanders v. State

Sanders v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 42 So. 3d 503 - Rowland v. State · 977 So. 2d 329 - Boyd v. State · 555 So. 2d 738 - Walker v. State · 110 So. 3d 735 - Southern Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Lloyd's of London · Kelly v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A conviction can withstand a double-jeopardy analysis only if each offense contains an element not contained in the other. If they do not, the two offenses are, for double-jeopardy purposes, considered the same offense, barring prosecution and punishment for both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.