Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 TENN 310 - Hicks v. Sprankle

Hicks v. Sprankle’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
5
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2015

22 state decisions

901923193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While not good as a conveyance of the estate by entirety, under recognized rules of construction the conveyance should operate, as nearly as possible, to produce the effect intended by the parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]here the intention is uncertain, resort may be had to subordinate rules of construction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.