Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 149 Tex. 439 - Hickman v. Hickman

Hickman v. Hickman’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp. (1954), Soza v. Hill (2008)

8 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

1701950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. English

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “our exemption laws should be liberally construed in favor of express exemptions, and should never be restricted in their meaning and effect so as to minimize their operation upon the beneficent objects of the statutes. Without doubt the exemption would generally be resolved in favor of the claimant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Our holding is in accord with our public policy as declared in Arts. 3486 and'3487, R.S.1925, that the court shall make an allowance of cash, not to exceed $500, to the widow and children to compensate them for any specific exempt articles not among the effects of the deceased; and no conditions whatever are fixed against their right to this payment. It applies the principle stated in Carson v. McFarland, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 130 , 132 (er. ref.): ‘our exemption laws should be liberally construed in favor of express exemptions, and should never be restricted in their meaning and effect so as to minimize their operation upon the beneficent objects of the statutes. Without doubt the exemption would generally be resolved in favor of the claimant.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “did not wear the rings continuously but ‘at times’ pledged them as security for loans and ‘at other times’ had them in a file at home or in his bank box ... [To hold otherwise would allow a debtor to exempt a shirt as clothing only] while on his back but not while reposing in a dresser drawer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.