Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

149 Tex. Crim. 455

195 S.W.2d 372

Nicholson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1946-06-12

<p>The opinion states the case.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1950

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1946-06-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, Judge.

¶2 In his motion for a rehearing appellant asserts that we erred in the original disposition of this case, because the opinion is contrary to the law and facts. This motion is top general in this: that it fails to point out wherein the opinion is contrary to the facts and the law. However, we have again reviewed the record and remain of the opinion that the case was properly disposed of on the original submission.

¶3 The motion for rehearing is overruled.

¶4 The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

/149/texcrim/455 · .json · Public domain