149 U.S. 191
Docket Nos. 16, 18, 19, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 24, 1893.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1892-10
Relies on Ex Parte Frederich · Ex Parte Humes
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1892-10
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1929
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
D. A. Townsend, Attorney General of South Carolina, J. Randolph Tucker, Sam'l Lord, and Ira B. Jones, for petitioners.
Henry Crawford and Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
The differences between the general facts in these cases and in that just considered are not controlling as to the result, and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case (13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 785) the applications for the writ of habeas corpus are severally denied.