Loeber v. Schroeder’s Empirical Analysis
149 U.S. 580 · 1893
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022 · most notably John Mallett v. State of North Carolina (1901), Andrews v. Andrews (1903)
41 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Leeper v. State of Texas · John Amis v. Nathan Smith · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. · Butler v. Gage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The motion to quash the fi. fa. in this case on the grounds that the order of the Court of Appeals, which directed it to he issued, was void for the reasons assigned, stood upon no better footing than a petition for rehearing would have done, and suggested federal questions for the first time, which, if they existed at all, should have been set up and interposed when the decree of the Court of Appeals was rendered on January 28, 1892.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnett v. Conklin“the refusal to quash an execution is not a final judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.