State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
81 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably State v. Fisher (2003), State v. Recor (1988)
81 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Lapham · State v. Patnaude · State v. Mecier · State v. Chambers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Virtually all evidence for the prosecution in a criminal case is prejudicial to some degree at least against the accused.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bruyette · State v. Lipka“[T]his Court will not interfere with discretionary rulings of the trial court that have a reasonable basis, even if another court might have reached a different conclusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.